Deutsche Lawyer Lied

I debated whether or not I should take the time to recreate this page on my WordPress legal site. Twitter helped me decide, Yes, I should.

The fact is that raising awareness re lawyers, the law, corrupt courts and our losses due to these failings, takes place only when we keep at it. So, I’m keeping at it.

The appeal, shown below, based on the fact the Deutsche lawyer lied, was denied. Overall the state courts and bankruptcy court protected the lawyer. In fact Judge Robert Jacobvitz, bankruptcy court, called the lies, working hard to defend his client.

That said, if you are up against this same, all too prevalent problem, the likelihood of winning an appeal or motion or case against a lying lawyer is … minuscule. However, if you have people go to court with you, then the presiding judge is not as likely to approve of dishonesty because he can be seen for what he is, if he does.

It was only after friends began accompanying me to court that I began to gain traction in keeping my home from Wells Fargo’s foreclosure. I was not as lucky with my condo.

Have people come to court with you, that helps. And the more prominent they are in your community, the better.


 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE
Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.                                                                       Supreme Court No:   31,175

KAREN MARIE KLINE, Pro Se,
Defendant – Appellant,

CROCKER, LTD., AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
AND MANHATTAN CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION,
Defendants – Appellees,

KAREN MARIE KLINE, Pro Se,
Petitoner-in-Redemption – Appellant,

RICHARD B. GREEN,
Purchaser; Cross- and Counter-Petitioner-in-Redemption – Appellee.

PETITION FOR REHEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 12-216

Court of Appeals No.  26,930
First Judicial District Court No.   D-0101-CV-2005-00515

1.        Richard Leverick, lawyer for plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust (“Deutsche”), lied to the Court at the Hearing to Confirm Sale, Partial Transcript, lines 8-11, Exhibit 3(b) of Exhibits 3(a) to Exhibit 3 (c),” when he said he served me the Amended Complaint before I filed Chapter 13.

2.         The dates are clear: I filed my Chapter 13 on March 21, 2005, Exhibit 1; Richard Leverick served me the Amended Complaint, which he needed to bring the lien holders before the court, on March 29, 2005, Exhibit 2. He also served each lien holder. Each lien holder was thereafter named as a defendant, as shown above.

3.        Pursuant to 11 U.S.C §362 service of Deutsche’s Amended Complaint during my Chapter 13 was prohibited.

WHEREFORE in the interest of justice Petitioner requests the Court reverse the lower courts and, in the general public interest, discipline the lawyer.

Karen Marie Kline
3255 Calle de Molina
Santa Fe, NM  87507
(505) 471-2367

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Petition for Rehearing Pursuant to Rule 12-216 was mailed to counsel of record as noted below on September 22, 2010,

For the Plaintiff – Appellee
Vern Payne                                        Richard Leverick, Esq.
PO 2100                                            5120 San Francisco Road NE
Los Lunas, NM  87031                      Albuquerque, NM  87109
(505) 858-3303

 Exhibit 1

 

Exhibit 2 

 

Exhibit 2, page 2  Service was March 29

Exhibit 3 (a)

Exhibit 3 (b) March 23rd is NOT after March 29

Exhibit 3 (c)

 

 

Leave a Reply

  

  

  


Will you help me keep my home and garden?
Please watch my GoFundMe video
 

 

**********