May, 2015 ~ In fighting a bank for your home, you may feel very hopeful after filing something like your Motion for Summary Judgment or your Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. But when the bank comes back at you with further threats to take your home, which sound formidable, you may feel daunted and less sure of your position.

Here’s how Wells Fargo responded to my Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing, also named Motion Summary Judgment. Wells Fargo could just as easily have responded to the same motion under its title made to conform to the PreTrial Hearing, but no. Wells Fargo chose to respond to the motion under its Summary Judgment title because, I would guess, it likes the more stringent requirements for Summary Judgment. Writing out something to evade Dismissal would be more difficult.

 

 

I’m posting Wells Fargo’s Response so you can see what it’s like, and compare it to what you may be answering.

WF response to Motion for Summary pg 1 560

 

WF response to Motion for Summary pg2 560

WF response to Motion for Summary pg3 560WF response to Motion for Summary pg4 560

WF response to Motion for Summary pg5 560

WF response to Motion for Summary pg6 560

WF response to Motion for Summary pg7 560

WF response to Motion for Summary pg8 560

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.